Showing posts with label Startups. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Startups. Show all posts

Saturday, December 8, 2012

OTTCONversations: John Gildred, SyncTV - OTT Video is Replacing Traditional Broadcast TV

Earlier this year at OTTCON 2012, I met up with John Gildred, Founder and CTO of Silicon Valley-based SyncTV, to discuss how OTT video is replacing traditional broadcast TV. According to Gildred, media consumption methods are changing, and mobile devices and OTT video is the main driver behind the shift. OTT is on the path to replace conventional TV, but for now, it's becoming a strong supplement to legacy broadcast platforms. Gildred says, video is such a focal point of what's going on and live television is going to be a big component too. An important theme in 2012 is making Over-the-Top technology be suitable for a full multi-channel live television services, and VOD, network DVR, accessibility on any device with all the things you would normally expect.



Another trend, Gildred says, is that broadcasters and content providers will seek and leverage OTT cloud-based video services.
"They may know they need a CDN, they know they need an app, but they don't necessarily know how to tie the billing in and the customer management, and the entitlement and the DRM, and there's so many other pieces they don't always know they need to have."
Those other pieces include; flexible CMS, VOD and live transcoding, rights management, availability windows, billing, branded apps, analytics and integration.

Gildred wrote, on the the SyncTV blog,
"As more people begin looking for alternatives to bundled cable subscriptions, some networks are exploring ways to retain the attention of a changing viewer base. A few prominent networks have also released apps for connected- device and TV app stores." "New standards, like MPEG DASH, and initiatives allow digital TV – think digital cable – to be shown over the Internet, and on connected devices. The idea is based on the different ways in which viewers receive content into their homes. Some watch digital TV. Others stream content, but often to a computer, or computer or connected device (and the required pile of hardware and cables) hooked up to a TV. Hybrid broadcasting would allow viewers to watch all of their streaming and digital broadcast content through one device."
The SyncTV provides an OTT platform for broadcasters and content providers for pay TV and pay-per-view. Gildred has experience working with companies like NBC Universal; France’s largest broadcaster, M6; AVAIL-TVN; LimeTV. SyncTV is headquartered in Sunnyvale, California with representatives in France, Spain, UK, Japan, Singapore, South Korea, and China. Earlier this, SyncTV's parent company Intertrust Technologies Corporation, signed a patent deal with HTC, giving it a 20% stake in SyncTV.


About SyncTV
SyncTV and its content distribution platform offers video content and service providers a turnkey solution for extending their offerings to millions of viewers across the Internet. SyncTV partners with television networks, broadcasters, content distributors, and content producers worldwide to distribute media across all forms of entertainment media including Internet-enabled connected TVs, Blu-ray players, set-top boxes, smartphones, tablets, and more. In addition to Dream Link Entertainment, SyncTV works with many of the world’s top entertainment studios including NBC Universal, Jaroo, Kidlet, Wieder.TV, Aim Flicks, Oasis TV, The Concert Channel and Bollywood Nirvana. Based in Sunnyvale, CA, SyncTV is a subsidiary of Intertrust Technologies Corporation (www.intertrust.com. For more information, visit www.synctv.com or follow @SyncTV on Twitter.

Sunday, September 30, 2012

OTTCONversations: Sean Knapp, Ooyala - Developing the Next Generation of Connected Media Experiences

I caught up with Sean Knapp, Co-founder and CTO of Ooyala, earlier this year at OTTCON 2012 to talk about some of the latest trends in multi-screen video delivery, monetization and personalized video experiences. Knapp was there to speak on the executive panel discussion, "Over-the-Top TV 2.0 – Developing the Next Generation of Innovative Connected Media Experiences."

According to Knapp, a lot of questions are being asked as the growth in online video explodes across the web and devices, in particular, how do we make online video more monetizable and more of a revenue stream? How do we solve this problem of the old adage of, analog dollars to digital pennies and now, justifiably digital dimes, and how do we make that digital dollars?



Video has to be more of a personalized experience


Five years ago online video consumption was only 1% of video viewing, and today that's grown to 9%. That brings with it, some very serious implications, as Knapp notes, "We're no longer in an experimental phase, we're in a viable revenue stream phase. But we're also in a potential cannibalization phase."

Knapp says, video has to be more of a personalized experience for each consumer and each piece of content on each device. Whether it's a mobile phone, tablet, set-top box or PC – they all provide an opportunity to engage the consumer in very different ways that ultimately will build a much stronger one-to-one relationship with every consumer.
"This has huge potential for the market, but it does require a shift in mindset from broadcast, which is a one to many – to personalization, which is a one-to-one dialogue with each and every consumer."

Online Video is still only a small percent of the market, but it's growing...


If you go by hours of content consumed, YouTube is 2.7% of all video viewed online based on statistics from earlier in the year. According to comScore's most recent comScore Video Metrix, an all-time high of 188 million U.S. Internet users watched 37.7 billion online content videos in August 2012, while video ad views totaled 9.5 billion. The notable findings showed that 87.3% of the U.S. Internet audience viewed online video, and video ads accounted for 20.1% of all videos viewed and 1.4% of all minutes spent viewing video online.

While the growth of online video viewing has seen a hockey stick trajectory over the last few years, Knapp notes that it serves as a really good reminder.

He says, "In the online world, we often times get caught up in this whole notion of revolutionary technologies and revolutionizing industries. We could go check Merriam-Webster, but I'm pretty sure "revolutionary technology" requires more than 2.7% of the market share."

That's not to underscore the impact that YouTube has had for the industry, and he acknowledges that it's been an incredible catalyst for the market and has accelerated huge massive growth and consumer adoption.
"But I think it serves as a very good reminder that we have a very long way to go, and that we're in very early innings. What is happening now in online video is that we're moving away form the early adopters, from the user-generated content and simpler business models, and we're actually taking that large body of content that you and I and every consumer has watched for decades, and we're helping that transition to screens. That's the great opportunity here. It takes a different approach and harder product and technology to build to do it, but that's really the promise of online video."

Also, with the growing adoption of OTT services, like Netflix, which boasts 27 million streaming members in the United States, Canada, Latin America, the United Kingdom and Ireland, it's clear that we're quickly moving into the next generation of connected media experiences.

Will all video be available over IP in the next few years?


During his OTTCON panel discussion, Knapp and his fellow panelist were asked their opinion of Anthony Wood's prediction that in four years time, all video will be available over IP.
Knapp says, "It depends on the definition. WIll all content be available over IP in four years? Yes, I think so. Because in four years I think we'll have solved a large number of these monetization problems. Will all content consumption be over IP? Absolutely not. I think we can expect in the next four years that we'll move from approximately 9% in the U.S. to a little bit internationally, to breaking through the 50% barrier in four years. I think it will be a significant turning point, obviously, but again it's very much dependent on availability of content on devices and the appropriate revenue models for that content."

Knapp believes that it will be a long time before all content consumption shifts to IP. But the primary need today is the availability of content, in new packages or bundles and through different monetization models.

What are Ooyala's customers asking for now and in the future?


Knapp says that along this evolutionary path the needs of the market are evolving as well. Three or four years ago, the needs of the market were largely around content management. Today, the needs have evolved to the second phase, he calls reach. Even though, content publishers can extend their reach across all connected devices, there's still a lot of fragmentation in the "10 foot" experience, and these problems are hard to solve. How do you create an engaging experience for consumers while keeping the performance fast and tightly integrated with your monetization model?

Knapp says that it's all about optimizing the experience for the consumer. Different customers have arrived at this set of needs sooner than others, and ultimately, two years from now all anybody is going to care about is the third phase, which is monetization.
"The reach problems will largely have been solved to some varying success. But the primary focus will be on monetization. How do I ultimately monetize my content better? The trick isn't, how do I show more ads or how do I just increase the CPMs of my current ads? That's absolutely part of the picture, but there's a lot more to it than that."
Knapp says it's more about using your analytics wisely to help you decide, how many ads should I show and where? And for each and every consumer, how do I change that? Some consumers respond differently to pre-rolls than overlays. It all depends on where they're at in their consumption cycle, and what state of mind the consumer is in.
"We're recommending content, and trying different pieces of content, and if we're in this exploratory phase, we should actually monetize less aggressively. Whereas, if we're in the recurring consumption phase, we should actually monetize more aggressively. And this is where the big opportunity is, that a few customers are starting to get to, but we will see this as the dominant need in the next two years."
Knapp says Ooyala designed its platform with studios, media companies and brands in mind, which has helped it attract big customers, including ESPN, Miramax, Bloomberg, Yahoo! Japan, Victoria’s Secret, Telegraph Media Group, The North Face, Rolling Stone, Dell, and many more on a global scale.


Where is Ooyala going and where will it be in four years?


As CTO and President of Technology, Knapp oversees Ooyala's technology and product roadmap. He notes that since its inception, Ooyala's focus has always been on how do they help their customers make more money. Not just in the short term, by showing more ads, but in the long term through better user experiences.

Ooyala is well known in the market for their analytics, their approach to data and monetization, and Knapp notes,
"We will continue to make major investments around monetization. It is the fastest growing and largest component of our R&D expenses. We all see this as a key component, not to just grow Ooyala's business but to growing the overall industry."
Just this past June, Ooyala announced that it had raised $35 million in new capital to drive standardization of its platform for online video streaming, monetization and discovery.

Where is content going and how will it change?


Knapp says that if we look at the introduction of online video, we're largely seeing the consumption of similar forms of content, and now we're simply seeing a transitioning of screens. Content producers are creating new forms of the same content, like the print industry had done when it when digital. We're staring to see major consumer brands like Victoria Secret, Dell and REI advertise through branded entertainment or tightly integrated into long-form content.
"We're seeing budgets shift as a result, while at the same time we're seeing premium content you and I consume everyday simply move to these same distribution channels. So it is the introduction of new content, but largely it's the same form."
The only caveat, he says, is that we're seeing mobile devices more clip based. ESPN as an example is repackaging it's popular television program, Sports Center, as clips and they're monetizing it incredibly well on mobile devices and on the PC.
"Similar types of content," says Knapp, "just different distribution strategies now fit to the devices."

Related


About Sean Knapp
Sean Knapp is a co-founder of Ooyala. As CTO and President of Technology, he oversees all engineering and helps define and execute Ooyala's product strategies. Before founding Ooyala, Sean worked at Google, where he developed and launched iGoogle, the company's popular, customizable home page. He also was a tech lead for Google's legendary Web Search team, helping that team increase Google revenues by $1B. Sean has both B.S. and M.S. degrees in Computer Science from Stanford University. He is a member of Ooyala's board of directors. Follow @seanknapp on Twitter

About Ooyala 
Ooyala delivers personalized video experiences across all screens. It is the leader in online video management, publishing, analytics and monetization. Ooyala’s integrated suite of technologies and services give content owners the power to expand audiences through deep insights that drive increased viewer engagement and revenue from video. Companies using Ooyala technology include ESPN, Pac-12 Enterprises, Miramax, Bloomberg, Victoria’s Secret, Telegraph Media Group, Tennis Australia, The North Face, Rolling Stone, Dell, Sephora and Yahoo! Japan. Headquartered in Mountain View, California, Ooyala has offices in Los Angeles, New York City, London, Sydney and Guadalajara, Mexico; and the company works with premier reseller and technology partners throughout the Americas, Europe, Africa, Japan and the Asia-Pacific region. Follow @ooyala on Twitter

Tuesday, October 5, 2010

Skype and Twitter "Do the CEO Shuffle"

The latest dance craze sweeping the tech world is, "Do the CEO Shuffle" with two notable and high profile positions being filled yesterday at Skype and Twitter. While this is not a new dance step, and actually it's quite well known in many industries, it's interesting that these two appointments fall on the same day. Both companies have enormous user bases and each are on a major roll.

So what it so interesting about Skype's new CEO announcement?

According to Erick Schonfeld who broke the news, Skype appointed Cisco SVP Tony Bates as CEO to replace Skype's current CEO Josh Silverman. Bates had been running Cisco's Enterprise, Commercial and Small Business Group, which accounted for 80 percent of Cisco's annual revenue worth $30 billion. Bates is the second Cisco executive to jump ship following Dr Jonathan Rosenberg who left Cisco last November to become Skype's CTO.

Schoenfeld said:
"The company recently filed to go public in August. And while there were rumors that a company like Cisco might buy it, adding a new CEO at this time points more strongly in the direction of an IPO. The earlier Cisco rumors now make sense. Cisco wasn’t trying to buy Skype. Rather, Skype was trying to hire the guy who runs most of Cisco."

In the press release Bates noted that Skype is both a powerful brand and global leader in Internet communications, and said:
"There are extraordinary opportunities ahead for Skype and I am eager to lead the company through this exciting juncture in its continuing transformation. I look forward to working with Skype’s management team and talented employees to engineer the next wave of game-changing products and services for our users.”
As Skype makes a serious move into the enterprise, and is on track to exceed $1 billion in revenues in 2011. Skype has over 560 million registered users and averages 124 million active users a month, but only 8.1 million of them actually pay for the service. Last week, Kara Swisher reported that Skype and Facebook are readying a deep integration partnership, that would include SMS, voice chat and Facebook Connect.

According to Om Malik:
"Bates’ hiring is indicative of three things:
  1. Skype is dead serious about an initial public offering (IPO).
  2. The company isn’t looking to sell out anytime soon.
  3. Skype is about to make a deeper push into carrier and enterprise markets."

And what about Twitter's new CEO?

As Twitter CEO for the last two years, Evan Williams noted the amazing growth of Twitter from 3 million registered users when he took job to more than 165 million. He cited the success of his brainchild, the New Twitter, as the main reason he is stepping down as CEO. He's appointed Twitter's COO, Dick Costolo, to succeed him as Twitter’s CEO starting today, so that he can focus completely on product strategy.


Williams and Costolo have been friends for years, and actually have switched roles sometime back with Williams returning to his software development roots and Costolo working on business development, revenue and other campaigns. Costolo is a three-time CEO and most recently helped found Feedburner, which was sold to Google. Costolo will oversee Twitter's day-to-day business functions and further expansion.

According to Fred Wilson, a VC who is also on Twitter’s board, said it's a very smart and gutsy move Williams' part, and that Costolo was “more of a manager, more of an executive, more of a businessman” than Williams.

Read more here: Evan Williams of Twitter Steps Down as Chief - NYTimes.com

Related:

Monday, October 4, 2010

Time's Up for 12seconds.tv, "Twitter for Video" Startup Officially Shuts Down October 22

In an email to the community of 12seconds.tv users, called "12ers", co-founder Sol Lipman announced today that the 2-year old startup known as the "Twitter for Video," would officially end operations on October 22nd. What began as an idea over beers between two friends with "scrappy energy" ended up being a wild ride with many ups and downs, Lipman explained that 12seconds is in its twilight and had reached the end of its life cycle.

In speaking with Adam Ostrow of Mashable, Lipman pointed out a number reasons why they are pulling the plug on their once popular video service. Citing low traffic on the site which had not seen any real growth in the last two years since its launch, along the high cost of running the video site which had been self-funded are two main reasons. But essentially, 12seconds had been squeezed out of the Twitter app ecosystem as that market has narrowed with the richer experience of the New Twitter.

He told Mashable that:
“I don’t really see the growth in Twitter that we were seeing [back when we launched]. I don’t see it as an explosive growth opportunity right now for a third-party application builder. In any ecosystem eventually there are going to be winners and losers. I think that’s going to shake out more and more as time goes by."
Lipman told Janko Roettgers of NewTeeVee, that 12seconds “fell victim to Twitter’s growth." It was originally built to be its own video community but got swept up in the excitement of Twitter only to later see its users abandon the site for other services. While 12seconds said had moved on from being a Twitter utility, Roettgers pointed out that there was more to it than that, and actually most of the 12seconds team has been working on the location-based social networking startup Rally Up, that had just been acquired by AOL in August.

12seconds seems to have followed a similar path as Seesmic, which also started up as a video community but re-engineered itself as a Twitter client developer. Rather than shutting down the site, Seesmic deemphasized the video conversations to a new domain Seesmic.tv which is still up and running.

With 12seconds.tv users could record 12 second video messages with a web cam or mobile phone to share as status updates on Twitter, Facebook and embed them into blog or websites. While the site saw some success in gaining celebrity users, crowdsourcing commercials, launching iPhones apps, taking part in the first annual Streamy Awards and reaching 200,000 users – 12 seconds was self-funded and was unable to create a sustainable revenue model or attract VC money.

Lipman had this to say to the loyal 12ers:
"It is time to end 12seconds. However, if 12seconds had a bucket list it would have filled it up with amazing life experiences!  We launched an innovative micro-vlogging system, built crazy mobile apps, created revenue with legit sponsors, we were nominated for awards and had the best users on the Internet - our beloved 12ers. 12seconds is not a failure - it is a life well-lived.  It really is about the journey.  I know this because I'm at the destination." 
12seconds will be releasing a download tool later this week for 12ers to bulk download their videos. It will be available until they pull the plug on October 22nd.

Related:

Sunday, February 28, 2010

CEO Conversations: Ron Yekutiel, Kaltura - Part 4, Kaltura's Business Model

In part four of my CEO Conversation, Ron Yekutiel talks about Kaltura's business model. With the conversations so far, Kaltura's offerings and market position may have sounded more like a kumbaya for open source video – but Kaltura does have successful revenue streams from from both licensing their video SaaS platform and from professional services. According to the most recent customer data, over 48,000 web sites are powered by Kaltura's open source platform. In their most recent announcement last week, Kaltura will be partnering with nacamar, one of the leading streaming and media hosting providers in Germany, to offer Kaltura's video management solution to broadcasters, publishers, content providers, multimedia agencies, enterprises and educational institutions in Germany, Austria, Switzerland and Luxembourg.

video platformvideo managementvideo solutionsvideo player

Larry Kless: So far, you've talked about all these free tools, but what is Kaltura's business model? How does Kaltura make its money?

Ron Yekutiel: Like I said before, there's no dissonance between doing good and doing well, and whilst it's an open source model – it's a distribution strategy, it's a development strategy, it's a philosophical strategy but it doesn't take away from Kaltura's ability to make money, and make money in a good way. The way we been doing so, we've been growing and we've been doing tremendously well by way of our economic situation is by selling:

A) Support and maintenance packages on top of the free community edition. So if you'd like to get Kaltura support and to ensure that you get debugged versions, the most advanced versions going forward, etc. you could join us and pay, that's number one. If you recall I mentioned the build vs. buy conundrum, by dropping the price to zero and getting it for free you definitely free up a lot of funds, you can come back and pay a part of it and say, "I want to ensure that I continue to have that freedom, flexibility control etc. and pay Kaltura to enable that." We didn't invent this model, it's been tremendously successful, like I said companies like a Red Hat, or like MySQL that have created significant business models out of that.

The second is professional development, professional support. Some companies come to us and asked Kaltura to develop stuff and we're definitely happy to so on their behalf. But that's only one half of the story. The second half is a classics SaaS model, and the truth is, until today 35,000 of the sites have connected to our SaaS offering.

Not just to the open source which we've just released the back end of which, it and in future turns out that 80% of our customers have expressed an interest to actually come and receive digital services from Kaltura – and the reason is that whilst you offer them complete freedom from vendor lock in and control and everything else, often they want to keep that is a real option, but still execute those several things from the sole vendor and it's always best to do with that single shop environment, the company that you've used the platform of because they tend to be the most expert in the field and for sure in the Kaltura standpoint, we're also the fastest growing therefore we have the largest amount of sites, economies of scale associated with that, the largest network for SEO purposes etc. etc., so there's all these reasons – and what are these SaaS packages?

Again – streaming, hosting, content delivery aggregation, advertising, syndication, search engine optimization – all these different things. So, the second half of what I said earlier around the classical open source model are companies coming back to Kaltura to say, "I will pay you this monthly package. We'll do that for a two-year or one-year contract", and this is how much they're going to pay based on gigabytes etc. etc. And whilst we offer they are the lowest price in market aligned with our open source strategy and philosophy of commoditizing the market in enabling the most amount of value for the least amount, we are still making wonderful money over there at the same time that we provide tremendous value and the best value to our customers. So we have a little but of both, and let's remember that we have these two things in a huge installed base of opportunity, it is not any more limited to the media and entertainment, and it's now getting into these new verticals that I have just mentioned.

So Kaltura has the makings of a billion-dollar company. Not different than other successful open source companies across very successful verticals, and since video is such a huge play – it's going to become part of just about everything on the web – there is that placeholder for an open source company to take a significant lion's share of the industry. For the reasons I mentioned, and to make make significant revenues out of both support and recurring digital services out of which.


This concludes this installment of CEO Conversations with Ron Yekutiel, see Part One here, Part Two here and Part Three here. My thanks to Ron Yekutiel for taking the time to speak with me, and thanks to Lisa Bennett for all the background material and information on Kaltura.

Thanks as well to Nathan Steiner at PLYmedia Inc. for the help with the free automatic transcriptions of this series of videos.

Saturday, February 13, 2010

Veoh Enters the Deadpool, Leaves Blood in the Water

The news that the troubled online video sharing site Veoh has filed for Chapter 7 bankruptcy to liquidate the business, doesn't come as a surprise to the many who had predicted its demise. Is it a sign of what's to come within the online video space in 2010? Commentary and analysis abound within the blogosphere on what made this promising startup fail, and how it burned through $70 million in venture funds. Founded in 2004, the San Diego, California-based company was an early entrant into the Internet television space and was once considered to be direct competitor with YouTube. Veoh launched an early beta of its distribution technology in late 2005 as "an open platform for content publishers of all sizes and sophistication who want to reach tomorrow's television audience" and had had big name financial backers like former Disney chairman Michael Eisner, Shelter Capital Partners, Spark Capital, Goldman Sachs, Adobe Systems, Intel Capital and Time Warner Investments. The site had 28 million users a month but was far from being a top online video content site, compared to Google's 135.8 million unique viewers who watched more than 13 billion videos on YouTube during the month of December 2009, according to comScore.

But as CEO Dmitry Shapiro said in a recent blog post, the lawsuit filed by Universal Music Group (UMG) for alleged copyright infringement, led in part to their demise along with the challenges of the broader macro-economic climate. While being a pioneer in the online video space, he admitted,
"Unfortunately, great vision, a passionate team, tens of millions of users, millions in revenues and victory in court were not enough."
Dan Rayburn pointed to a lack of focus and execution that led in part to Veoh's downfall. While the company had vision, it tried to be everything to everyone changing its business model many times and was unable to sustain a viable business.

According to Dan:
"Veoh never really executed a clear and concise business plan on what they were going to offer, what problem their platform would solve, or what the business model of the company was going to be. While all companies need to adapt their focus to try and stay in step with how the market evolves, Veoh always struggled to define who they were and what they were doing in the market"
At NewTeeVee, Ryan Lawler noted that despite raising ample funding and having solid search and recommendation technology, there were a number of reasons for what went wrong at Veoh. A few of the reason were, raising too much money, getting too big too fast, no strategic focus, requiring a client download, and turning its back its users.

Robert Sandie, co-founder and President of Viddler, wrote a thoughtful post outlining what
Viddler has built a sustainable business where others have failed. A few points he share were echoed by many other about keeping the business small and and eye on the bottom line, not raising too much money, keeping a strategic focus and optimizing the service.

Ben Homer wrote on Online Video Watch about Veoh's achievements:
"Veoh’s greatest contribution to online video space was its preemptive lawsuit against Universal Music Group later joined by DivX. At the time, few in the industry had the resources (or the balls) to take on an established media company. The successful outcome – the court upheld the company’s protection from lawsuit under the DMCA – meant it was far less likely for any other future lawsuit by an established rights holder against an online service provider – and there have been few similar suits since. Had these companies not been willing to put themselves fully into this fight the landscape of the industry would likely look very different today."

Mark Hall, founder and CEO of Vodpod didn't seem to think that Veoh's demise is particularly illustrative of any trend or a forecast of things to come.

In a guest post on NewTeeVee, Hall said:
"While it’s sad to see a site like Veoh come to an end, I don’t think it’s particularly illustrative of any trend or a forecast of anything to come. The storm clouds I see, and worry about, include a more fractured video environment due to HTML5 and lack of uniform support by the browsers for a single, standardized video codec; Apple’s intransigence on Flash on the iPhone and iPad, with the result that most of the video available today on the web is and will continue to be broken on those devices; and the lack of any clear path technically, right now, to replicate what is done with Flash video for both advertising and video sharing."
Like Joost, Maven Networks, The Feedroom*, and a long list of other promising and well-funded online video startups, Veoh joins The Deadpool and has left blood in the water, $70 Million to be exact. Veoh's story is an important lesson for any online video startup. Vision matched with a viable business plan, filling a market niche, execution and timing, product focus and listening to your customers are key ingredients to success.

Related:
*Update 2/13/10 9:26 PM: While the Feedroom is not officially in the The Deadpool, and was actually acquired by KIT Digital for $10 million in 10/09, the brand was retired in 12/09 after a successful consolidation and integration of the IP and resources. The company was a pioneer in the space and raised close to $70 million in funding over the course of 10 years, and met an untimely demise, which I think earns it an honorary place in The Deadpool.

Tuesday, August 11, 2009

Ooyala Gets a New Boss, Jay Fulcher Appointed As CEO

While it's no secret that Ooyala, the Silicon Valley-based online video platform provider, has been searching for the best and brightest talent for its fast growing company -- today they have announced the appointment of Jay Fulcher as President & Chief Executive Officer. Fulcher will join Ooyala and become a member of the Board of Directors, immediately. Former CEO and Co-Founder Bismarck Lepe, who has led the company since its inception in early 2007, has been appointed President of Product Strategy, reporting to Fulcher, and will focus primarily on developing and delivering new products for both the publishing platform and monetization industry.

Last month Techcrunch reported that Ooyala was in the process of an executive search which was not motivated by their investor, Sierra Ventures, but by Bismarck Lepe himself as he didn't necessarily think he was the guy to take the company to the next level. Since he and fellow Co-founders Sean Knapp and brother Belsasar Lepe retain control of the company it's important to make sure that they're doing what's best for shareholders and not managing the company with our egos.

Lepe explained,
"I've been searching for the right guy that's going to help us scale our business for about 6 months now, and after talking to about 25 people who were all very excited about joining and taking the helm as the CEO of the company, we found Jay and invite him and welcome him to the Ooyala family. Jay brings the necessary experience, track record and passion to lead our company. We are extremely pleased to have attracted a CEO of Jay’s caliber to Ooyala. He will have an immediate impact on our aggressive plans for growth.”




Jay Fulcher is a long-time enterprise software industry executive who has held a variety of senior executive roles. Most recently, Fulcher served as President & CEO of Agile Software, where he led the sale of Agile to Oracle in late 2007. Prior to Agile, Fulcher spent five years at PeopleSoft, where he led the transformation of PeopleSoft’s $1+ billion global services organization after being President of its $400 million Products Division. Prior to PeopleSoft, Fulcher held senior executive positions at Red Pepper Software and SAP. He was attracted to Ooyala for its focus on developing "game-changing technology" as he put it and the impact IP-based video will have on the future.

Fulcher said,
“IP-based video is now a powerful reality and with that comes opportunities to better target advertising and deliver the content consumers want on their terms. Ooyala has been able to grow faster than any other Online Video Platform company because of its focus on technology, customer success and personalization. I am excited by the prospect of taking that early success and leveraging it to build a large, innovative and profitable business."

Fulcher is inheriting a very talented, young team that can benefit from experienced leadership given how fierce the competition is in the saturated online video platform space. This change of leadership is part of the evolution of small companies that become very long lasting fixtures in the Valley much like what Larry Page and Sergey Brin did when they brought in Eric Schmidt to lead Google.

In my two-part interview with Bismarck Lepe last month, he described that Ooyala's business was growing at a rapid pace and he estimated that the current market for online video platforms is roughly of 300,000 customers who are people who are willing to pay for an online video platform. Ooyala's partner portfolio includes over 500 enterprise and media companies including Warner Brothers, Wenner Media, Fremantle, Armani, Sybase and Electronic Arts.

Lepe says that we've hit a turning point in online video where companies are pushing more professional content online and there are also additional advertising and monetization options to actually create value for content creators. Ooyala has seen CPMs grow from $2 to well over $10 which helps subsidize higher quality content. With the all the reports that online video viewership continues to rise Ooyala is getting ready for the next big wave.

Related:

Sunday, August 2, 2009

Delve Networks and Akamai Partner to Deliver Cloud-based Online Video Publishing

It was more than a year ago that Seattle, Washington-based Delve Networks changed its name from Pluggd and business focus from podcasting tools to online video publishing tools for content publishers looking to create their own branded video experience. Like many others in the saturated online video platform market Delve offers an intuitive end-to-end solution to manage, deliver, publish and measure viewership. Earlier this month launched a self-service option for their video publishing platform. Delve’s video platform includes patented semantic video technology which extracts information from within the video to provide enhanced search, meta-data tagging, and indexing capabilities.

On Friday, Delve Networks announced a strategic relationship with Akamai, the leading Content Delivery Network (CDN) that Delve says is aimed at challenging Brightcove as the leader in the online video platform space, "to give publishers a better alternative than Brightcove’s." The collaboration between Delve and Akamai offers Delve's customers a complete video management solution to deliver HD-quality video on Akamai’s global video delivery network which supports both Adobe’s dynamic streaming and Microsoft’s Silverlight Smooth Streaming technologies. Financial details of the collaboration were not disclosed.

In an interview with Beet.TV, Delve Networks VP of Product Management Edgardo Nazario says that there is great synergy between the two companies and that they "will work together on projects and also pitch each other's customers."



Delve Networks CEO Alex Castro had this to say about the collaboration with Akamai:
"Our joint effort will help us reach many more customers than we could reach alone. Increasingly we are looking for leading partners who can help us provide the best in video management and solutions for our customers. We can think of no one better than Akamai to work with.”

Akamai has similar partnerships with KickApps, VMIX, Multicast, Onstream Media, VBrick, KIT Digital and Ooyala and while this deal is not much different from existing relationships with the other companies and Tim Napoleon, Chief Strategist for Digital Media at Akamai said:
"A fast, efficient media distribution workflow based on industry standards is critical to any successful online business. Akamai's mission is to support innovation and leadership in this space and Delve clearly offers an impactful solution. Providing unique and innovative capabilities, such as a cloud-based architecture and search inside, Delve's video platform is not only technologically advanced, but also easy to use."
In an interview with Pete Wylie this past week Alex Castro described Delve's performance this year and his vision for the future of the company in growth in 2009. "We've tripled our customer base since beginning of the year and launched our self-service product, we've signed some important big name customers and we're waiting on timing to talk about those partnerships," said Castro. Delve, which raised a $1.6 million venture round in May and snce launching 10 months ago, Delve Networks has signed up over 70 customers including Standard & Poors, 1800Flowers, the Kansas City Chiefs, and many others.

While this all sounds like good news it actually hasn't been a good week for Akamai. The comoany has come under scrutiny by Wall Street just this week following a disappointing earnings call by missing analyst expectations and saw shares drop 15% quarter due to a risky strategy of sacrificing revenue growth to hold on to customers. Dan Rayburn also pointed out that despite their pricing problems, Akamai is still not doing enough to grow their CDN business.

Within the online video ecosystem this deal could be viewed as another example of the CDN becoming a commodity. With the rise of online video platforms over the last few years the direct line consumers have to CDNs has been blurred as OVPs offer scalable plans, extensible modules and content delivery solutions. For more on this topic see the LinkedIn discussion: Is control going from CDNs to OVPs ?

Delve Networks is also a platinum sponsor of the Online Video Platform Summit and will be showcasing its platform and technology at the event. For more information on Delve Networks and a free trial, visit www.delvenetworks.com.

About Akamai

Akamai(R) provides market-leading managed services for powering rich media, dynamic transactions, and enterprise applications online. Having pioneered the content delivery market one decade ago, Akamai's services have been adopted by the world's most recognized brands across diverse industries. The alternative to centralized Web infrastructure, Akamai's global network of tens of thousands of distributed servers provides the scale, reliability, insight and performance for businesses to succeed online. Akamai has transformed the Internet into a more viable place to inform, entertain, advertise, interact, and collaborate. To experience The Akamai Difference, visit www.akamai.com.

About Delve Networks

Founded in 2006, Seattle-based Delve Networks makes it possible for organizations of any size across any industry to realize the potential of online video. Delve's advanced, easy-to-use and highly customizable online video platform offers all the tools necessary for publishing video online including video hosting, encoding, content delivery, content management, semantic search, metrics, advertising and syndication. By leveraging the power of cloud computing, Delve gives its customers the ability to quickly adapt as demand for content increases allowing for greater overall scalability, efficiency and reliability. Delve is backed by DFJ Frontier, Intel Capital and Labrador Ventures.


Related:
Updated: 8/3/09

Tuesday, July 21, 2009

Twitcam Goes Live on Twitter, Trumps the Competition

I had a chance to test Twitcam this past evening, the new live video streaming Twitter mash-up from Livestream (formerly Mogulus), and see firsthand what happens when live video meets Twitter. According to Livestream, Twitcam is the first application that lets Twitter users add live streaming video to their Twitter feeds with a webcam and a click of the button. Twitcam.com was taken from concept to product in a week thanks to a soon-to-be-announced player API (application programming interface) from Livestream and trumps CamTweet, the offering by live video streaming competitor Justin.tv that debuted just ten days earlier at TechCrunch's Real Time Stream CrunchUp and entered in a private beta today.

Erick Schonfeld noted that,"It is a really simple, but powerful idea. So simple, in fact, that one of Justin.TV’s competitors, Livestream CEO Max Haot (who was watching the demo from New York via UStream, another live Web video competitor) decided to create the exact same product using Livestream’s new, yet-to-be released APIs."

pointed out that Justin.tv learned a painful lesson about being discrete with a business idea until it goes live and confirmed through a Livestream spokeswoman that Max Haot did in fact see the live demo and quickly created his own app saying, "it shows how rapidly Livestream, and technology in general, is moving."

[twitcam_klessblog.jpg]

From a user standpoint it's really easy to use and I was able to start "video Tweetcasting" within just a few minutes after a few simple steps. Twitter users need only to log in to Twitcam.com with their existing Twitter account and a webcam and press the ‘Broadcast Live’ button. Twitcam automatically detects the camera, creates a page and live video player for the broadcast, and posts the link in the user’s Twitter feed so followers can join in live. A Livestream account is not needed and a unique Twitcam live broadcast page is created from your Twitter profile. Recent broadcasts are stored on your profile page.

Within minutes of starting my broadcast and sending my first Tweet I was joined by several friends who were able to watch my live video feed and chat with me. Thanks to @Schuras @SafetyGeeksSVI @Gennefer @spotcher and anyone else I may have missed for helping me with the test by joining the live broadcast.

From my page I could see all the Tweets centralized within a real-time chat interface. Each Tweet is created when you enter something in the live chat and the Tweets include the broadcast page URL along with a mention of your Twitter name. @Gennefer said, "It was fun! I've been wanting to check it out and assess potential use cases. Would've been perfect for #dewlabs interaction." She also thought that "Could be interesting for cooperative entertainment experiences, but I couldn't see the other viewers' posts."

There are a few issues that need work and with the open API there may be possible improvements. Not seeing each others posts is a real drawback and it would be ideal for the Tweets to be aggregated into an interface for all viewers to see. The video size of the archive recording at 320 x 240 is a little small for most applications. I also didn't embed the video in this post because the default for the video is autoplay which most people find extremely annoying. You can though see my broadcast test here.

Amit Desai listed a number or ways that both that Twitcam and CamTweet can strengthen relationships going beyond simple chat to deeper video communications for marketers, businesses, researchers, academia and families. 

Adding live video to Twitter really turns the worldwide talk show into a real live talk show. It makes the makes the conversation a real conversation with a live video stream driving the Twitter stream.

Twitcam is free and available today at http://www.twitcam.com.

Follow Livestream (livestreamcom) on Twitter


About Livestream
Livestream (www.livestream.com - formerly Mogulus) provides everything needed to easily webcast live, build an engaged audience and monetize these efforts. Founded in 2007, the company is based in New York and includes Gannett Co. as a minority shareholder and investor. Producers can use Livestream to create live, linear and on-demand Internet television to broadcast anywhere on the Web through a single embeddable player widget. The service comes in two flavors: Free (ad-supported) and Premium (ad-free, white-label, higher-quality). Unique features include the ability to mix multiple live cameras, overlay graphics, and desktop streaming with 3D effects.

Related:

Wednesday, July 1, 2009

Making Sense of the Noise About Joost and Maven Networks

The last two days have been full of sobering news about the demise of Maven Networks and restructuring of Joost. While many have seen the writing on the wall for Joost who seemed to struggle to get a solid footing in the online video landscape as it changed its business model over the last few years. It reportedly burned through its $45 million in venture capital and has drastically slashed operations and shifted focus to provide "white label online video platforms for media companies, including cable and satellite providers, broadcasters and video aggregators."

"In these tough economic times, it's been increasingly challenging to operate as an independent, ad-supported online video platform," said Mike Volpi, who has stepped down as CEO of Joost as part of the reorganization but will remain Chairman of Board. "After much analysis, we have decided to change our focus and to start providing white-label online video platforms for media companies and distributors," Volpi added. "We have built a solid technology platform that there is demand for in the marketplace, and look forward to this new chapter for our company."

It wasn't too long ago that I reported the Joost-Ooyala hookup that Joost would be leveraging Ooyala for uploading, transcoding, content management services, and analytics and just prior to that Ooyala had tapped Mike Volpi to Ooyala's Board of Advisors. So when Joost announced they were shifting gears to be an online video platform Ryan Lawler asked, What Does Joost's News Mean for Ooyala?, and that as Joost positions itself to offer the same video management services as Ooyala, "Should Volpi remain on the board of two companies that are essentially competitors?"

Ooyala CEO and Co-founder Bismarck Lepe said in a statement, "We are still very excited about having Joost as a customer. They signed a long term agreement and we are here to help them as they continue to evolve their business and throughout this transition period. One of the things we've always been to Joost is a technology services provider for a small segment of their publisher base. While they move in the direction of being more of an enablement company, they'll continue to use our tools and services in order to provide high quality video experiences for their customers."

About Volpi's role on Ooyala's board, Lawler said, "Some folks think he should step down from Ooyala's board. David Wadler, CEO of Twistage -- a company that, not coincidentally, also competes in the online video infrastructure segment -- even suggests that Volpi might have a fiduciary responsibility to do so." However Lepe had this to say, "Most of our Board of Advisory roles are are between one and two years. For now, we are very happy with the relationship with Mike and his organization."

For online video platform Maven Networks, which was acquired by Yahoo for approximately $160 million only 17 months ago, Techcrunch reported that it's now officially in the deadpool and that Yahoo plans to shut it down. Anthony Ha got confirmation that while Yahoo is ending its Maven Network contracts it is not abandoning the technology as Yahoo spokesperson Brian Nelson said in a statement, "While video initiatives remain a priority for Yahoo!, both for its consumer and advertising experiences, we are increasing investment in some areas while scaling back in others. After careful consideration, Yahoo! is planning to wind down its Maven Networks contracts. This decision will allow us to focus our resources on the continued improvement of our core video offerings, such as enhancing the consumer video experience on Yahoo!."

Nelson also noted that since Q4 2008 Yahoo! has closed or announced their intention to close nearly twenty Yahoo! services such as Y! Live, Jumpcut, Yahoo! 360, GeoCities, My Web and Yahoo! Briefcase and will continue to evaluate their portfolio.

While this is sad news for the many people who have lost their jobs it's inaccurate to say that other online video platforms are celebrating as Robin Wauters suggested, "There’s always the possibility that the platform will eventually live on under different ownership of course, but rest assured that competitors like Brightcove, Ooyala and KIT Digital are currently celebrating over the news."

Scott Broomfield, CEO of Veeple, thinks that all the doom and gloom reporting about Joost and Maven is just noise and that failing is not failure but part of the innovation cycle. Om Malik offered his analysis of what went wrong with Joost and quoted the NewTeeVee crew who he said summed up the situation very succinctly “Becoming a white-label video provider was what a business did when all other strategies failed.”

However, Ben Homer offered some advise for Joost and other companies in the online video space on how to succeed they need to be able to behave like agencies and focus on best-in-class service offerings, relationships, controlling costs and providing value to advertisers.

I would add that emphasizing value and not just capabilities will be important for online video platforms to differentiate themselves in the saturated market.

Thursday, June 25, 2009

Veeple Extends Reach With Bitgravity

Interactive online video platform Veeple has announced a new partnership with Bitgravity in which Veeple will standardize its offering on BitGravity's global high-speed content delivery network. BitGravity in turn will be adopting Veeple's platform as one of their three standard partners, with the others being Brightcove and Fliqz. Veeple also announced a series of enhancements to its interactive service including player branding, syndication, contact information and an affiliate program.

"BitGravity's focus on fast, high-quality video delivery is of primary importance in working with them," said Scott Broomfield, co-founder and chief executive officer of Veeple. "BitGravity truly understands high performance video delivery, ensuring a fantastic online video experience for our customers," he continued.



I spoke with Scott yesterday about the announcement and he outlined the "need for speed" as the driving factor for partnering with Bitgravity. Both have stiff competition in the saturated online video platform and CDN space and much like the Qik/Brightcove announcement yesterday the Veeple/Bitgravity alliance is another example of the evolving value chain within the online video ecosystem. CDNs are turning into a commodity says Broomfield, they are looking for partnerships, content, players, analytics and, we'll more see combining and some attrition over time.

Broomfield highlighted the three drivers for moving to Bitgravity.
  1. High quality - delivery move from Amazon to Bitgravity who has a hub and spoke model which gives much quicker downloads. Marketers love high quality video and Vimeo and Fliqz uses Bitgravity. Bitgravity will use Veeple as one of three partners. Interactive component, simple business model, start at $99, way easier for sales
  2. High reliability - faster buffering
  3. Speed - the hub and spoke architecture, pushes video to spoke, reduces buffer times, video and interactive features, 7-10% bits coming down the wire, a good 40% better
Veeple's platform delivers interactivity with clickable objects within the video player and cites a 22% in-video click-through rate, over 10 times today's pre-roll statistics. Veeple believes we were at the beginning of a new era in online video, an era where the passive, lean-back viewing experience is transitioning to a more lean-in, engaging experience. The age of interactive, actionable video. Early customers have included Yale University, AmazingTechProducts. com, and Global Social Media Network

“Veeple is an excellent example of the type of service we envisioned supporting when we designed BitGravity’s CDN. Veeple’s focus on offering a simple customer experience for uploading, managing, hosting, and best of all, making online video actionable, were the deciding factors in our working with Veeple.” said Chris Turner, VP of Worldwide Sales at BitGravity.


About Veeple
Veeple is the leader in simple, Interactive Online Video (IOV) solutions for marketers looking to deepen customer engagement through online video. With Veeple’s solution absolutely no programming is required for interactivity, full content management for multiple clients, branded player video delivery and full clickable analytics. Veeple provides the necessary tools for successful online video campaigns. Veeple is a private company headquartered in Palo Alto, California. For additional information go to www.veeple.com/solutions.php

Scott Broomfield Veeple / CEO 408-605-4231 (c) / 650-331-0785 (o)
Twitter: @veeple
LinkedIn: http://tinyurl.com/d29vqb
Facebook: http://tinyurl.com/ck73lt

About Bitgravity

BitGravity has built the first CDN for Interactive Broadcasting, which is optimized to deliver affordable, HD-quality video on demand, live broadcasts, and interactive applications for massive audiences on the Internet. BitGravity's patent-pending CDN is Tier 1, highly scalable, and delivers the performance that consumers want and expect, including streaming videos that play instantly, and live video with no buffering. The company is based in Burlingame, Calif and is privately funded. BitGravity was founded in early 2006 by technology pioneers Perry Wu and Barrett Lyon.

Public Relations:
press@bitgravity.com
+1.650.356.8572
http://twitter.com/bitgravity


Related:

6/26/09: Updated links and text

Sunday, April 5, 2009

TubeMogul Looks to Grow and Standardize its Online Video Analytics with $3 Million in Series A Funding from Trinity Ventures

TubeMogul, online video's most popular distribution and analytics service, announced last week it has received $3 million in Series A funding from Trinity Ventures. "We invested in TubeMogul because we saw the potential of a viable business model, a solid product with a growing customer base at this early phase. However, it is my relationship with the executive team that that reminds me why I love what I do, helping passionate entrepreneurs fundamentally change an industry,” said General Partner from Trinity Ventures Ajay Chopra, who will join TubeMogul’s board. "TubeMogul has the team, vision and product to drive a fundamental change in the way online video is monetized.”

The funding will be used to fast-forward growth of TubeMogul's video distribution platform and accelerate standardization of its online video analytics. With over 75,000 users and hundreds of millions of streams tracked, TubeMogul solidifies its position at the nexus of online video.

Last week at the Future of Television conference Tim Street got an on camera interview with Brett Wilson, TubeMogul CEO and co-founder about the investment and some new features coming down the pike.



"We are thrilled to be partnering with a world-class venture firm like Trinity Ventures whose reputation as a value added partner is well known among entrepreneurs,.” Brett said, "To have Ajay on our board who was also a successful entrepreneur and passionate about winning this is space is invaluable."

With TubeMogul, users upload videos once and TubeMogul deploys them to as many of the top video sharing sites the producer chooses. TubeMogul's integrated analytics then provide a single source of metrics on where, when, and how often the videos are viewed. TubeMogul's free beta service has been live since November of 2006. In January 2008, TubeMogul announced the launch of its Premium Products, which include a host of new professional features.

Through its acquisition of Illumenix in October 2008, TubeMogul is also able to offer rich engagement and performance metrics through InPlay, its Flash-based analytics service. Integrating within minutes with any Flash video player, InPlay tracks audience statistics and user interaction in real time. TubeMogul also offers a marketplace to connect online video producers and advertisers and a promotion service for new viral campaigns, video ads or web series.

TubeMogul is on track to be cash-flow positive by the fourth quarter of 2009. "Since the company’s founding, TubeMogul has hit every single one of its revenue targets, and this one should be no different," said Dave Toth, co-founder of NetRatings and a TubeMogul board member and early investor. Other early investors include Knight's Bridge Capital Partners.

I recently visited the TubeMogul headquarters in Emeryville, California and met with Brett and the TubeMogul team. I had a great conversation with Mark Rotblat, VP of Business Development about online video distribution, analytics, TubeMogul’s InPlay technology and more. Look for that video later in the week.

Congratulations to Brett, John, Mark, David, Eugene and everyone at TubeMogul!

About Trinity Ventures
Founded in 1986, Trinity Ventures, a boutique firm, partners with passionate entrepreneurs to transform revolutionary ideas into reality. With over $1.5 billion under management, Trinity Ventures was founded on the principle of personal engagement and mutual respect with the entrepreneurs we fund. Trinity Ventures focuses on early stage technology ventures with a particular emphasis on digital media, Internet services, mobility, security and software markets.

About TubeMogul
TubeMogul is the first online video analytics and distribution company serving publishers large and small who need independent information about video performance on the Internet and automated upload to the Web's top video sharing sites. TubeMogul's analytic technology aggregates video-viewing data from multiple sources to give publishers improved understanding of when, where and how often videos are watched. TubeMogul offers tracking far beyond the traditional metric of video "views." TubeMogul InPlay, which can be activated within minutes, tracks rich viewership metrics such as audience engagement, attention span and site performance -- all in real-time.

For more information about TubeMogul, contact:
David Burch
david@tubemogul.com
+1 510 653 0501

Related: